( BeautifulSorrow )
Novice
|
I want to know right now, since I have seen so many topics about incest lately, what is so wrong with incest? And I'm asking you personally, I do not want the typical, "It's just so nasty!" reply, or better yet, "Because it's just wrong!" That wasn't the question: WHY is it so wrong? Society makes it out to be wrong, obviously, but I don't want society's answer, I want your answer and opinions on incest, and the reasons behind those opinions. Which is why I have decided to put this into the Intellectual Forum instead of some other Forum where a bunch of noobs will be like, "Ewwwww, you're sick for even asking this question!!!" I want mature replies, please.
------- "Something left unsaid is better than nothing said at all."
|
|
|
Aero360
Omnipotent One
Patron
|
It increases the chances of birth defects. Well that's one reason.
------- Pittsburgh Penguins: 2-77-3, 7 pts. Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway. I am Heart92's second LW Husband. Hooray for polygamy! NoNoNora383 is my LW lover.
|
1:30 pm on June 4, 2008 | Joined Jan. 2006 | 713 Days Active Join to learn more about Aero360 Pennsylvania, United States | Straight Male | 12239 Posts | 19391 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
SovSull
Omnipotent One
Patron
|
from the perspective of natural selection it is completely counter-intuitive to sexual reproduction since you're mingling similar genes together as opposed to grouping together more diverse ones. that would be my answer.
------- what do i write here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nikki
la vie en rose
Patron
Support Leader
|
From a physical standpoint - it highly increases the chance that the offspring would have a mental/physical defect. Otherwise - I just don't understand how you can have sexual feelings for someone in you're family like that, and for me, it's even more bizarre that people act on those impulses. HOWEVER, if the two people involved have the operations nescessary to ensure that they cannot have children, and that they are both consenting adults, I don't see why, in the eyes of the law, it should be considered illegal.
------- .:.Faut souffrir pour etre belle.:. ♥ hey there, delilah, what's it like in new york city?
|
1:33 pm on June 4, 2008 | Joined Dec. 2002 | 1442 Days Active Join to learn more about Nikki England, United Kingdom | Label Free Female | 17815 Posts | 40780 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
( BeautifulSorrow )
Novice
|
Quote: from Nikki at 1:33 pm on June 4, 2008
From a physical standpoint - it highly increases the chance that the offspring would have a mental/physical defect. Otherwise - I just don't understand how you can have sexual feelings for someone in you're family like that, and for me, it's even more bizarre that people act on those impulses. HOWEVER, if the two people involved have the operations nescessary to ensure that they cannot have children, and that they are both consenting adults, I don't see why, in the eyes of the law, it should be considered illegal. 
See, this is what I was looking for. She gave me her opinion, although it had a typical society answer thrown in, it still had her opinion. And btw, in 26 states in the U.S., it is legal to marry your first cousin, so.
------- "Something left unsaid is better than nothing said at all."
|
|
|
|
|
( BeautifulSorrow )
Novice
|
Quote: from SovSull at 1:35 pm on June 4, 2008
Quote: from BeautifulSorrow at 4:32 pm on June 4, 2008
Quote: from SovSull at 1:30 pm on June 4, 2008
from the perspective of natural selection it is completely counter-intuitive to sexual reproduction since you're mingling similar genes together as opposed to grouping together more diverse ones. that would be my answer. 
The thing about that is, we are all related, in one way or another, and supposedly, we are all descended from incestual relationships. So that is also a typical society answer, not what I was looking for. Thank you any how. 
my definition of incest is sexual relations between two members of the same immediate family. if your definition is between two human beings who share similar genes, then what you're asking is "what is wrong with two people being attracted to each other" 
Incest is not immediate family, it is those having sexual relations who do share the same DNA, no matter how distant. Therefore, your answer is still a typical society answer.
------- "Something left unsaid is better than nothing said at all."
|
|
|
|
|
( BeautifulSorrow )
Novice
|
Quote: from SovSull at 1:40 pm on June 4, 2008
Quote: from BeautifulSorrow at 4:32 pm on June 4, 2008
Quote: from SovSull at 1:30 pm on June 4, 2008
from the perspective of natural selection it is completely counter-intuitive to sexual reproduction since you're mingling similar genes together as opposed to grouping together more diverse ones. that would be my answer. 
The thing about that is, we are all related, in one way or another, and supposedly, we are all descended from incestual relationships. So that is also a typical society answer, not what I was looking for. Thank you any how. 
so what distinction are you trying to make? are you saying that relations between two close relatives who share a significantly large amount of dna (such as a brother and sister) is no different than two people who may have had a common ancestor hundreds of generations back but are otherwise unrelated? 
My point is anyone up to at least 6th cousins being looked down upon society still. It should be there right and there right alone, that is my point. If two people love each other, why the hell should it matter?
------- "Something left unsaid is better than nothing said at all."
|
|
|
Nikki
la vie en rose
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from BeautifulSorrow at 9:34 pm on June 4, 2008
And btw, in 26 states in the U.S., it is legal to marry your first cousin, so. 
Aye, I know. I think first cousins is somewhat different from sleeping with your brother/sister, or a parent. I know it still carries a risk of defects, but I think a lot of people see it as...more wrong somehow.
------- .:.Faut souffrir pour etre belle.:. ♥ hey there, delilah, what's it like in new york city?
|
1:49 pm on June 4, 2008 | Joined Dec. 2002 | 1442 Days Active Join to learn more about Nikki England, United Kingdom | Label Free Female | 17815 Posts | 40780 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
( BeautifulSorrow )
Novice
|
Quote: from Nikki at 1:49 pm on June 4, 2008
Quote: from BeautifulSorrow at 9:34 pm on June 4, 2008
And btw, in 26 states in the U.S., it is legal to marry your first cousin, so. 
Aye, I know. I think first cousins is somewhat different from sleeping with your brother/sister, or a parent. I know it still carries a risk of defects, but I think a lot of people see it as...more wrong somehow. 
I would never try incest, but I don't look down on people who do, and I accept people for who they really are. If two people love each other, I don't see how it should matter. It's like I would never be a lesbian, but that doesn't mean I can't hang out with and be friends with lesbians, and accept them, now can I? That's my view on incest.
------- "Something left unsaid is better than nothing said at all."
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|