Because of the social context of 'sexually predatory behavior', it's not a good reason.

-------
the one and only serious forum troll

---

Because of the social context of 'sexually predatory behavior', it's not a good reason.

---

That's a good point.
Do you have any suggestions for a more fitting reasoning?

-------
But I would walk 500 miles,
And I would walk 500 more, Just to be the man who walked 1000 miles,
To fall down at your door.
Yummu

---

Quote: from prisoner of hss at 7:19 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

Because of the social context of 'sexually predatory behavior', it's not a good reason.

---

That's a good point.
Do you have any suggestions for a more fitting reasoning?

---

---

Quote: from Rastafarian at 10:24 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

Quote: from prisoner of hss at 7:19 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

Because of the social context of 'sexually predatory behavior', it's not a good reason.

---

 

 That's a good point.  
 Do you have any suggestions for a more fitting reasoning?

---

'Soliciting sexually explicit material is not permitted' is just fine, kind of like you said before.

---

Cool.
I'll use that then whenever I put up one of them for a DoS, or at least I'll try to remember, a lot of my DoS statements are robotic now.

-------
But I would walk 500 miles,
And I would walk 500 more, Just to be the man who walked 1000 miles,
To fall down at your door.
Yummu

---

i like 'dumb horny teen' as a reason too though

---

Moderating is serious business!

-------
But I would walk 500 miles,
And I would walk 500 more, Just to be the man who walked 1000 miles,
To fall down at your door.
Yummu

---

In most obvious cases, 'sexual predator' is fine. If not sure and member is doing it, 'seeking explicit material' seems fine.

---

---

Quote: from jamesish at 10:31 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

In most obvious cases, 'sexual predator' is fine.  If not sure and member is doing it, 'seeking explicit material' seems fine.

---

Obvious cases meaning what?

---

Like a mod can look at that persons posts and topics.  Some sexual predators are just not socially able to fit in like we can.  If every single post is sexual, its almost obvious a sexual troll.  Call them a predator for good measure.

You would have to judge those posts by yourself and make your own standards.

-------
|Myspace|

---

Quote: from prisoner of hss at 10:36 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

Quote: from jamesish at 10:31 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

In most obvious cases, 'sexual predator' is fine. If not sure and member is doing it, 'seeking explicit material' seems fine.

---

Obvious cases meaning what?

---

Like a mod can look at that persons posts and topics. Some sexual predators are just not socially able to fit in like we can. If every single post is sexual, its almost obvious a sexual troll. Call them a predator for good measure.

You would have to judge those posts by yourself and make your own standards.

---

How about not call someone a sexual predator until there's substantial evidence that they are?

-------
the one and only serious forum troll

---

Quote: from jamesish at 10:39 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

Quote: from prisoner of hss at 10:36 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

Quote: from jamesish at 10:31 pm on Aug. 28, 2008

---

In most obvious cases, 'sexual predator' is fine.  If not sure and member is doing it, 'seeking explicit material' seems fine.

---

Obvious cases meaning what?

---

 

 Like a mod can look at that persons posts and topics.  Some sexual predators are just not socially able to fit in like we can.  If every single post is sexual, its almost obvious a sexual troll.  Call them a predator for good measure.  

 You would have to judge those posts by yourself and make your own standards.

---

Calling someone a 'predator' is serious shit in modern life and even if someone is a troll I don't see how that's right.

How about not call someone a sexual predator until there's substantial evidence that they are?

---

Meh, maybe "predator" is a little hard to judge when to use it.  Agreed.

-------
|Myspace|