|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( neodymie )
Professional
|
     
 No, you just take it as an attack. There is a difference.
I gave me argument that I don't believe you understand human nature, that or you don't accept it, and you failed to respond to it. 
Yeah, I don't understand... Hence I ask questions. That's what they're for. I wanna know why you think that you shouldn't have to take responsibility for yourself and your actions.
From your posts, you seem like the type of person who thinks sex is only meant to be if you want to have a baby, or can have a baby. You think women can just get pregnant and that's that. That it is not rough having to go through pregnancy. So if they don't want to do it, they shouldn't have sex.
Human nature goes against this mindset. That is all there is to it.
No, I am not against recreational sex. What I'm saying is that when you have sex you take a chance of getting pregnant. When you drive you take the chance of hitting someone. Is killing the person you ran into dealing with the problem? No!
Post edited at 4:38 pm on Sep. 3, 2008 by neodymie
-------
" I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel,
but I am, so that's how it comes out. " - Bill Hicks
|
|
|
The Raven
stewfoo
 Patron
|
Oh how lovely, comparing this running over someone with a car!
And this is why I tend to stay the fuck out of these topics. The people who start them are idiots. 
(THAT was a personal attack, sir. )
-------
Bring me my monocle. I want to look rich.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( neodymie )
Professional
|
Quote: from drifting at 6:26 pm on Sep. 3, 2008
Quote: from neodymie at 6:40 pm on Sep. 3, 2008
Quote: from drifting at 3:36 pm on Sep. 3, 2008
And the Republicans want to spend money they dont have
As opposed to Obama?
give tax breaks to oil companies
and take away your basic constitutional rights.
So you're for windfall taxes on oil companies and for basic constitutional rights huh?
We have a massive deficit, that being said, we really have no money. However, McCain's voting history demonstrates that he would damage that deficit even more. He could do nothing for reducing it. As for constitutional rights, fuck yes. But neither party can, or will deliver it to the fullest extent.
So you believe in peoples rights and you believe in taking huge amounts of money from companies and giving it to others? A little hypocritical don't you think? Contrary to popular belief America IS a capitalist society. Not socialist. Redistribution of wealth is against everything this country stands for. Post edited at 6:37 pm on Sep. 3, 2008 by neodymie
-------
" I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel,
but I am, so that's how it comes out. " - Bill Hicks
|
|
|
drifting
Sasquatch Eats Kittens
Patron
|
Quote: from neodymie at 9:37 pm on Sep. 3, 2008
Quote: from drifting at 6:26 pm on Sep. 3, 2008
Quote: from neodymie at 6:40 pm on Sep. 3, 2008
Quote: from drifting at 3:36 pm on Sep. 3, 2008
And the Republicans want to spend money they dont have
As opposed to Obama?
give tax breaks to oil companies
and take away your basic constitutional rights.
So you're for windfall taxes on oil companies and for basic constitutional rights huh?
We have a massive deficit, that being said, we really have no money. However, McCain's voting history demonstrates that he would damage that deficit even more. He could do nothing for reducing it. As for constitutional rights, fuck yes. But neither party can, or will deliver it to the fullest extent.
So you believe in peoples rights and you believe in taking huge amounts of money from companies and giving it to others? A little hypocritical don't you think? Contrary to popular belief America IS a capitalist society. Not socialist. Redistribution of wealth is against everything this country stands for.
Your fighting a loosing battle, considering giving tax breaks to the wealthy is redistribution of wealth as well. Thats exactly what the Republican party has instituted, and thats exactly what Obama is pushing to destroy. Oh, and Palin actually took money from the drilling companies, and gave it directly back to the people. If thats not redistribution of wealth, I want to know what is. At least if its used in tax dollars, everyone has the potential to benefit.
-------
Department of Redundancy Department
|
|
|
( neodymie )
Professional
|
Your fighting a loosing battle, considering giving tax breaks to the wealthy is redistribution of wealth as well.
No giving tax breaks to the wealthy is keeping money with those who earned it. Right where it belongs.
Thats exactly what the Republican party has instituted, and thats exactly what Obama is pushing to destroy.
Whats that? Capitalist America?
Oh, and Palin actually took money from the drilling companies, and gave it directly back to the people. If thats not redistribution of wealth, I want to know what is. At least if its used in tax dollars, everyone has the potential to benefit.
I agree. It was stupid. They could have found a better way to spend it.
-------
" I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel,
but I am, so that's how it comes out. " - Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
( neodymie )
Professional
|
Quote: from drifting at 12:47 pm on Sep. 4, 2008
Quote: from neodymie at 12:21 am on Sep. 4, 2008
Your fighting a loosing battle, considering giving tax breaks to the wealthy is redistribution of wealth as well.
No giving tax breaks to the wealthy is keeping money with those who earned it. Right where it belongs.
Thats exactly what the Republican party has instituted, and thats exactly what Obama is pushing to destroy.
Whats that? Capitalist America?
Oh, and Palin actually took money from the drilling companies, and gave it directly back to the people. If thats not redistribution of wealth, I want to know what is. At least if its used in tax dollars, everyone has the potential to benefit.
I agree. It was stupid. They could have found a better way to spend it.
How is allowing the wealthy to pay a LOWER tax than the working class helping anything? Its making the wealthy more wealthy, and it provides them with an unfair advantage.
The wealthy of this country likely pay more a year than you even make. Why is that fair?
-------
" I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel,
but I am, so that's how it comes out. " - Bill Hicks
|
|
|
drifting
Sasquatch Eats Kittens
Patron
|
Quote: from neodymie at 4:30 pm on Sep. 4, 2008
Quote: from drifting at 12:47 pm on Sep. 4, 2008
Quote: from neodymie at 12:21 am on Sep. 4, 2008
Your fighting a loosing battle, considering giving tax breaks to the wealthy is redistribution of wealth as well.
No giving tax breaks to the wealthy is keeping money with those who earned it. Right where it belongs.
Thats exactly what the Republican party has instituted, and thats exactly what Obama is pushing to destroy.
Whats that? Capitalist America?
Oh, and Palin actually took money from the drilling companies, and gave it directly back to the people. If thats not redistribution of wealth, I want to know what is. At least if its used in tax dollars, everyone has the potential to benefit.
I agree. It was stupid. They could have found a better way to spend it.
How is allowing the wealthy to pay a LOWER tax than the working class helping anything? Its making the wealthy more wealthy, and it provides them with an unfair advantage.
The wealthy of this country likely pay more a year than you even make. Why is that fair?
Because its a percentage. If everyone payed the same amount, how would it be fair if Im giving say 30% of my income in taxes, but someone who is in a more lucrative industry is only giving 0.001% income. To them that money isnt even going to matter, but to me 30% of my income is more than my rent each month. The entire way its set up is so that everyone pays the same amount out of their pocket, so it does not have a negative impact on anyone. However, tax breaks and incentives completely break the system.
-------
Department of Redundancy Department
|
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
